|
Music
Motivation among Piano Players
Preliminary Analyses
Peter
MacIntyre
Gillian
Potter
Cape
Breton University
During the months of June and July
2010, we conducted an online survey among piano
players. The sample was contacted by posting messages
on discussion groups, Facebook groups, and online piano
forums. In this brief report we will offer some
preliminary analysis as a way to say ‘thank you’ to
those who completed the survey. It will take more time
to fully analyze the data and write up an article for
publication. We have a lot of written responses
(approximately 300) to read and analyze on hopes,
expectations and fears. Thank you for those! We also
had 48 people participate in Survey 2, in which they
discussed their motivation, their learning history, and
other topics. This data is very interesting, we will
begin analyzing it shortly.
For the moment, we will present
some preliminary analysis on key topics from Survey 1.
Our first analyses describe the
people who participated in the study. We had a good
balance between men and women, with a little more than
half the sample being male.
Gender
| |
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
Male |
166 |
53.9 |
54.4 |
54.4 |
|
Female |
139 |
45.1 |
45.6 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
305 |
99.0 |
100.0 |
|
For 92% of the participants, the
primary instrument was piano. Those who played
something else mentioned guitars most frequently, but
there was a wide variety of other instruments that
people play. Many people listing a combination of
instruments they play, some named as many as five or six
different instruments.
The sample was varied in age as
well. Approximately 30% were under 30 and a few more
than that were over 50.
Age
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
Did not respond |
2 |
.6 |
.6 |
.6 |
|
20-29 |
52 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
17.5 |
|
30-39 |
41 |
13.3 |
13.3 |
30.8 |
|
40-49 |
64 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
51.6 |
|
50-59 |
58 |
18.8 |
18.8 |
70.5 |
|
Over 60 years of age |
45 |
14.6 |
14.6 |
85.1 |
|
Under 20 years of age |
46 |
14.9 |
14.9 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
308 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
We asked people how old they were
when they first started playing piano. It was most
popular to begin playing when they were under 10 years
of age, approximately half the sample began this early
in life. This means that there also is a sizable group
of players who started later in life. Some of the
participants started learning at a young age and then
picked it back up after a long break. It is not safe to
assume that everyone started learning piano as a child.
Indeed, with the increase in internet support groups,
we might see even more adults learning or coming pack to
learning piano.
|
Age Range |
Percentage |
|
Less than 5 years old |
9.1 |
|
5 – 9 years |
40.9 |
|
10 - 19 |
18.5 |
|
20 – 29 |
6.8 |
|
30 – 39 |
7.1 |
|
40 - 49 |
7.8 |
|
50 – 59 |
6.2 |
|
Over 60 years |
1.9 |
Practice, Play, and Improvement.
The sample indicated that
participants practice and play frequently. Almost
three-quarters of the sample practice every day, or a
few times per day. Practice was defined by an attempt to
learn something new or refine one’s skill.
How
often do you practise?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
|
Valid |
a few times a day |
122 |
39.6 |
39.6 |
|
|
once a day |
105 |
34.1 |
34.1 |
|
|
a few times a week |
57 |
18.5 |
18.5 |
|
|
once a week |
7 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
|
|
less than once a week |
17 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
|
|
Total |
308 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
Playing for enjoyment was captured
by another question. Here, the rates are just a little
lower. In this case, 61% play for enjoyment every day.
It is safe to say that the sample is well engaged with
the piano.
How often do you play?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
|
Valid |
a few times a day |
101 |
32.8 |
32.8 |
|
|
once a day |
93 |
30.2 |
30.2 |
|
|
a few times a week |
75 |
24.4 |
24.4 |
|
|
once a week |
13 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
|
|
less than once a week |
26 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
|
|
Total |
308 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
With this level of engagement in
learning and playing, it is not surprising that people
see themselves as improving their skill.
In general, do you see
yourself as steadily improving?
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
no |
13 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
4.2 |
|
sometimes |
70 |
22.7 |
22.7 |
26.9 |
|
yes |
225 |
73.1 |
73.1 |
100.0 |
|
Total |
308 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Motivation.
A
central theme of the research was motivation and how
various features of motivation are interrelated.
It takes a great deal of time and energy to learn
piano. From where does that motivation come? A popular
theory in motivational psychology is Deci & Ryan’s
(1985)
self-determination theory. They propose that
motivation can be described along a continuum that
ranges from external authority telling us what to do
(e.g., parents and teachers) to purely intrinsic reasons
(e.g., for enjoyment and personal fulfillment). In
general, motivation is more stable and learning is
strongest if the source of motivation tends to be
intrinsic. The following table describes the four types
of motivation we measured, the average level of that
motivation, and correlations with effort and desire to
learn.
|
Type of motivation |
Mean* |
Correl. W. Effort |
Correl. W. Desire to learn |
|
External regulation –extrinsic
motives, governed by external authorities (e.g.,
teachers or parents). Example: “I practice
because my parents make me do it.” |
5.788
|
-.15
(p < .01) |
-.21
(p < .01) |
|
Introjected regulation – adopt
others’ rules, understand what should be done,
but do not necessarily accept the rules as one’s
own. Example: “I know I should practice, but I
really don’t want to do it.” |
14.021
|
.07
(n.s.) |
.12
(p < .05) |
|
Identified regulation – accept
others rules as one’s own, am willing to be
governed by those rules. Example: “If I want to
be a good musician I know I have to practice.” |
24.307
|
.51
(p < .001) |
.63
(p < .001) |
|
Intrinsic motivation – it’s
enjoyable, I like it, I value it for its own
sake. Example: “I practice because I enjoy
improving my skill and sounding better when I
play.” |
22.784 |
.52
(p < .001) |
.63
(p < .001) |
(* The range of
scores for each scale was 4 - 28).
Motivation in this sample was highest for identified and
intrinsic reasons, and the lowest for introjected and
extrinsic motives. This is an encouraging finding
because it suggests a long term commitment to playing
piano. It is not especially surprising, however, given
that most people in our sample are adults who do not
have parents and teachers requiring that they practice
and play. We also see that both identified and
intrinsic regulation correlate strongly with the
respondents’ effort at playing piano. There is also a
weaker, negative correlation between external regulation
and effort. This indicates that the more people are
playing piano because somebody else expects them to, the
less effort they tend to put into it. A very similar
pattern, with even stronger correlations, was observed
for the desire to learn. Again, among those who feel
motivated by external reasons, there is a lower desire
to play. Among those motivated by intrinsic reasons,
there is a tendency to have a stronger desire to learn.
Intrinsic motives for playing the piano also are the
best predictors of how much perceived competence a
person has and his or her willingness to play.
Willingness to Play in Different
Contexts
Another question we wished to
answer was whether or not the context in which a person
might play (e.g., playing formally or informally,
playing with a friend, acquaintance or stranger) has an
effect on willingness to play. Our findings suggested
that the context does affect how willing one is to
play. Pianists are more willing to play when:
1)
Playing with a friend (Most Preferred, mean = 8.0
/ 10), and
2)
Playing with an acquaintance (mean = 7.1 / 10)
Conversely, pianists are least
willing to play when:
1)
Playing formally for a large group of strangers
(Least Preferred, mean = 4.8 / 10), and
2)
Playing informally to a small group of strangers
(mean = 5.3 / 10)
These results make
sense considering the majority of our participants
appear to be intrinsically motivated. Playing for
friends and acquaintences is viewed as more enjoyable
compared with a group of strangers. It is somewhat
surprising that playing informally to a small group of
strangers was rated almost as low playing formally to a
large group of strangers.
A final word.
These
are some of the key findings we initially found from our
study. They are only preliminary results and much more
analyzing lies ahead! So if anyone would like to view
the finalized results, feel free to contact my professor
Dr. Peter MacIntyre at the following address:
peter_macintyre@cbu.ca
Once
again, a big thank you to all of those who participated
in our study and also for all of your comments and
feedback. Your help is greatly appreciated and please
know that your participation has helped contribute to
the great deal of research on music and motivation that
is going on today.
Sincerely,
Dr.
Peter MacIntyre
Gillian Potter
|